On Tue, Apr 30, 2019 at 04:03:32AM +0530, Raag Jadav wrote:
> External E-Mail
>
>
> On Mon, Apr 29, 2019 at 11:00:05AM +0200, Ludovic Desroches wrote:
> > Hello Raag,
> >
> > On Tue, Apr 23, 2019 at 01:06:48PM +0530, Raag Jadav wrote:
> > > External E-Mail
> > >
> > >
> > > Performing i2c write operation while SDA or SCL line is held
> > > or grounded by slave device, we go into infinite at91_twi_write_next_byte
> > > loop with TXRDY interrupt spam.
> >
> > Sorry but I am not sure to have the full picture, the controller is in
> > slave or master mode?
> >
> > SVREAD is only used in slave mode. When SVREAD is set, it means that a read
> > access is performed and your issue concerns the write operation.
> >
> > Regards
> >
> > Ludovic
>
> Yes, even though the datasheet suggests that SVREAD is irrelevant in master
> mode,
> TXRDY and SVREAD are the only ones being set in status register upon
> reproducing the issue.
> Couldn't think of a better way to handle such strange behaviour.
> Any suggestions would be appreciated.
I have the confirmation that you can't rely on the SVREAD flag when in
master mode. This flag should always have the same value.
I am trying to understand what could lead to your situation. Can you
give me more details. What kind of device it is? What does lead to this
situation? Does it happen randomly or not?
Regards
Ludovic
>
> Cheers,
> Raag
>
> >
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Raag Jadav <raagja...@gmail.com>
> > > ---
> > > drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-at91.c | 6 +++++-
> > > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-at91.c b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-at91.c
> > > index 3f3e8b3..b2f5fdb 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-at91.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-at91.c
> > > @@ -72,6 +72,7 @@
> > > #define AT91_TWI_TXCOMP BIT(0) /* Transmission Complete */
> > > #define AT91_TWI_RXRDY BIT(1) /* Receive Holding Register
> > > Ready */
> > > #define AT91_TWI_TXRDY BIT(2) /* Transmit Holding Register
> > > Ready */
> > > +#define AT91_TWI_SVREAD BIT(3) /* Slave Read */
> > > #define AT91_TWI_OVRE BIT(6) /* Overrun Error */
> > > #define AT91_TWI_UNRE BIT(7) /* Underrun Error */
> > > #define AT91_TWI_NACK BIT(8) /* Not Acknowledged */
> > > @@ -571,7 +572,10 @@ static irqreturn_t atmel_twi_interrupt(int irq, void
> > > *dev_id)
> > > at91_disable_twi_interrupts(dev);
> > > complete(&dev->cmd_complete);
> > > } else if (irqstatus & AT91_TWI_TXRDY) {
> > > - at91_twi_write_next_byte(dev);
> > > + if ((status & AT91_TWI_SVREAD) && (dev->buf_len == 0))
> > > + at91_twi_write(dev, AT91_TWI_IDR, AT91_TWI_TXRDY);
> > > + else
> > > + at91_twi_write_next_byte(dev);
> > > }
> > >
> > > /* catch error flags */
> > > --
> > > 2.7.4
> > >
> > >
>
> _______________________________________________
> linux-arm-kernel mailing list
> linux-arm-ker...@lists.infradead.org
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
>
