On 05/01, Sudeep Holla wrote: > > On Wed, May 01, 2019 at 06:13:30PM +0200, Oleg Nesterov wrote: > > On 04/30, Sudeep Holla wrote: > > > > > > While the TIF_SYSCALL_EMU is set in ptrace_resume independent of any > > > architecture, currently only powerpc and x86 unset the TIF_SYSCALL_EMU > > > flag in ptrace_disable which gets called from ptrace_detach. > > > > > > Let's move the clearing of TIF_SYSCALL_EMU flag to __ptrace_unlink > > > which gets executed from ptrace_detach and also keep it along with > > > or close to clearing of TIF_SYSCALL_TRACE. > > > > > > Cc: Oleg Nesterov <o...@redhat.com> > > > Cc: Paul Mackerras <pau...@samba.org> > > > Cc: Michael Ellerman <m...@ellerman.id.au> > > > Cc: Thomas Gleixner <t...@linutronix.de> > > > Cc: Ingo Molnar <mi...@redhat.com> > > > Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.ho...@arm.com> > > > > Acked-by: Oleg Nesterov <o...@redhat.com> > > > > Since 1/4 and 2/4 are completely independent of arm64 changes in 3&4/4, > I prefer you take these via your tree.
Sorry Sudeep, I can't do this, I need to reanimate my account on kernel.org. Oleg.
