Hi, Akinobu,
Regardless to reply of the cover, few nits here.
On 5/2/19 5:59 PM, Akinobu Mita wrote:
+
+static const struct nvme_reg nvme_regs[] = {
+ { NVME_REG_CAP, "cap", 64 },
+ { NVME_REG_VS, "version", 32 },
Why don't we just go with "vs" instead of full name of it just like
the others.
+ { NVME_REG_INTMS, "intms", 32 },
+ { NVME_REG_INTMC, "intmc", 32 },
+ { NVME_REG_CC, "cc", 32 },
+ { NVME_REG_CSTS, "csts", 32 },
+ { NVME_REG_NSSR, "nssr", 32 },
+ { NVME_REG_AQA, "aqa", 32 },
+ { NVME_REG_ASQ, "asq", 64 },
+ { NVME_REG_ACQ, "acq", 64 },
+ { NVME_REG_CMBLOC, "cmbloc", 32 },
+ { NVME_REG_CMBSZ, "cmbsz", 32 },
If it's going to support optional registers also, then we can have
BP-related things (BPINFO, BPRSEL, BPMBL) here also.
Thanks,
