From: Arnd Bergmann <a...@arndb.de>

[ Upstream commit 27b141fc234a3670d21bd742c35d7205d03cbb3a ]

clang points out that the return code from this function is
undefined for one of the error paths:

../drivers/s390/net/ctcm_main.c:1595:7: warning: variable 'result' is used 
uninitialized whenever 'if' condition is true
      [-Wsometimes-uninitialized]
                if (priv->channel[direction] == NULL) {
                    ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
../drivers/s390/net/ctcm_main.c:1638:9: note: uninitialized use occurs here
        return result;
               ^~~~~~
../drivers/s390/net/ctcm_main.c:1595:3: note: remove the 'if' if its condition 
is always false
                if (priv->channel[direction] == NULL) {
                ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
../drivers/s390/net/ctcm_main.c:1539:12: note: initialize the variable 'result' 
to silence this warning
        int result;
                  ^

Make it return -ENODEV here, as in the related failure cases.
gcc has a known bug in underreporting some of these warnings
when it has already eliminated the assignment of the return code
based on some earlier optimization step.

Reviewed-by: Nathan Chancellor <natechancel...@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <a...@arndb.de>
Signed-off-by: Julian Wiedmann <j...@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <da...@davemloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sas...@kernel.org>
---
 drivers/s390/net/ctcm_main.c | 1 +
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)

diff --git a/drivers/s390/net/ctcm_main.c b/drivers/s390/net/ctcm_main.c
index ad17fc5883f6..e22b9ac3e564 100644
--- a/drivers/s390/net/ctcm_main.c
+++ b/drivers/s390/net/ctcm_main.c
@@ -1595,6 +1595,7 @@ static int ctcm_new_device(struct ccwgroup_device *cgdev)
                if (priv->channel[direction] == NULL) {
                        if (direction == CTCM_WRITE)
                                channel_free(priv->channel[CTCM_READ]);
+                       result = -ENODEV;
                        goto out_dev;
                }
                priv->channel[direction]->netdev = dev;
-- 
2.20.1

Reply via email to