Re: [RFC PATCH 3/6] sched/dl: Try better placement even for deadline tasks that do not block

[Quentin Perret]

On Monday 06 May 2019 at 06:48:33 (+0200), Luca Abeni wrote:
> @@ -1591,6 +1626,7 @@ select_task_rq_dl(struct task_struct *p, int cpu, int 
> sd_flag, int flags)
>  
>       rcu_read_lock();
>       curr = READ_ONCE(rq->curr); /* unlocked access */
> +     het = static_branch_unlikely(&sched_asym_cpucapacity);

Nit: not sure how the generated code looks like but I wonder if this
could potentially make you loose the benefit of the static key ?

Thanks,
Quentin