Hi Suravee.

I wonder, how this interacts with Hyper-V SynIC; see comments below.

On 22/03/2019 12.57, Suthikulpanit, Suravee wrote:
> AMD AVIC does not support ExtINT. Therefore, AVIC must be temporary
> deactivated and fall back to using legacy interrupt injection via
> vINTR and interrupt window.
> 
> Introduce svm_request_activate/deactivate_avic() helper functions,
> which handle steps required to activate/deactivate AVIC.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Suravee Suthikulpanit <suravee.suthikulpa...@amd.com>
> ---
>  arch/x86/kvm/svm.c | 57 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
>  1 file changed, 54 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/svm.c b/arch/x86/kvm/svm.c
> index f41f34f70dde..84116e689d5f 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/svm.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/svm.c
> @@ -391,6 +391,8 @@ static u8 rsm_ins_bytes[] = "\x0f\xaa";
>  static void svm_set_cr0(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned long cr0);
>  static void svm_flush_tlb(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, bool invalidate_gpa);
>  static void svm_complete_interrupts(struct vcpu_svm *svm);
> +static void svm_request_activate_avic(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
> +static bool svm_get_enable_apicv(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
>  
>  static int nested_svm_exit_handled(struct vcpu_svm *svm);
>  static int nested_svm_intercept(struct vcpu_svm *svm);
> @@ -2109,6 +2111,9 @@ static void avic_set_running(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, 
> bool is_run)
>  {
>       struct vcpu_svm *svm = to_svm(vcpu);
>  
> +     if (!kvm_vcpu_apicv_active(vcpu))
> +             return;
> +
>       svm->avic_is_running = is_run;
>       if (is_run)
>               avic_vcpu_load(vcpu, vcpu->cpu);
> @@ -2356,6 +2361,10 @@ static void svm_vcpu_blocking(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>  
>  static void svm_vcpu_unblocking(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>  {
> +     if (kvm_check_request(KVM_REQ_APICV_ACTIVATE, vcpu))
> +             kvm_vcpu_activate_apicv(vcpu);
> +     if (kvm_check_request(KVM_REQ_APICV_DEACTIVATE, vcpu))
> +             kvm_vcpu_deactivate_apicv(vcpu);
>       avic_set_running(vcpu, true);
>  }
>  
> @@ -4505,6 +4514,15 @@ static int interrupt_window_interception(struct 
> vcpu_svm *svm)
>  {
>       kvm_make_request(KVM_REQ_EVENT, &svm->vcpu);
>       svm_clear_vintr(svm);
> +
> +     /*
> +      * For AVIC, the only reason to end up here is ExtINTs.
> +      * In this case AVIC was temporarily disabled for
> +      * requesting the IRQ window and we have to re-enable it.
> +      */
> +     if (svm_get_enable_apicv(&svm->vcpu))
> +             svm_request_activate_avic(&svm->vcpu);
> +

Are we sure, we're not accidentally re-enabling AVIC, if it was disabled via
kvm_hv_activate_synic()?


>       svm->vmcb->control.int_ctl &= ~V_IRQ_MASK;
>       mark_dirty(svm->vmcb, VMCB_INTR);
>       ++svm->vcpu.stat.irq_window_exits;
> @@ -5206,6 +5224,34 @@ static void svm_hwapic_isr_update(struct kvm_vcpu 
> *vcpu, int max_isr)
>  {
>  }
>  
> +static bool is_avic_active(struct vcpu_svm *svm)
> +{
> +     return (svm_get_enable_apicv(&svm->vcpu) &&
> +             svm->vmcb->control.int_ctl & AVIC_ENABLE_MASK);
> +}
> +
> +static void svm_request_activate_avic(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> +{
> +     struct vcpu_svm *svm = to_svm(vcpu);
> +
> +     if (!lapic_in_kernel(vcpu) || is_avic_active(svm))
> +             return;
> +
> +     avic_setup_access_page(vcpu, false);
> +     kvm_make_apicv_activate_request(vcpu->kvm);
> +}
> +
> +static void svm_request_deactivate_avic(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> +{
> +     struct vcpu_svm *svm = to_svm(vcpu);
> +
> +     if (!lapic_in_kernel(vcpu) || !is_avic_active(svm))
> +             return;
> +
> +     avic_destroy_access_page(vcpu);

Something like avic_destroy_access_page() is not called, when AVIC is
disabled via kvm_hv_activate_synic().

Is that an oversight in the other code path, is it not needed here,
or am I missing something?


> +     kvm_make_apicv_deactivate_request(vcpu->kvm);
> +}
> +
>  /* Note: Currently only used by Hyper-V. */

nit: This comment should probably go away, now.

Regards
Jan


>  static void svm_refresh_apicv_exec_ctrl(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>  {
> @@ -5493,9 +5539,6 @@ static void enable_irq_window(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>  {
>       struct vcpu_svm *svm = to_svm(vcpu);
>  
> -     if (kvm_vcpu_apicv_active(vcpu))
> -             return;
> -
>       /*
>        * In case GIF=0 we can't rely on the CPU to tell us when GIF becomes
>        * 1, because that's a separate STGI/VMRUN intercept.  The next time we
> @@ -5505,6 +5548,14 @@ static void enable_irq_window(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>        * window under the assumption that the hardware will set the GIF.
>        */
>       if ((vgif_enabled(svm) || gif_set(svm)) && nested_svm_intr(svm)) {
> +             /*
> +              * IRQ window is not needed when AVIC is enabled,
> +              * unless we have pending ExtINT since it cannot be injected
> +              * via AVIC. In such case, we need to temporarily disable AVIC,
> +              * and fallback to injecting IRQ via V_IRQ.
> +              */
> +             if (kvm_vcpu_apicv_active(vcpu))
> +                     svm_request_deactivate_avic(&svm->vcpu);
>               svm_set_vintr(svm);
>               svm_inject_irq(svm, 0x0);
>       }
> 

Reply via email to