On 10-05-19, 12:35, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > From: Rafael J. Wysocki <[email protected]> > > It may not be particularly clear why the kobject_put() after > failing kobject_init_and_add() in cpufreq_policy_alloc() is not > redundant, so add a comment to explain that. > > Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <[email protected]> > --- > drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c | 5 +++++ > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+) > > Index: linux-pm/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c > =================================================================== > --- linux-pm.orig/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c > +++ linux-pm/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c > @@ -1133,6 +1133,11 @@ static struct cpufreq_policy *cpufreq_po > cpufreq_global_kobject, "policy%u", cpu); > if (ret) { > pr_err("%s: failed to init policy->kobj: %d\n", __func__, ret); > + /* > + * The entire policy object will be freed below, but the extra > + * memory allocated for the kobject name needs to be freed by > + * releasing the kobject. > + */ > kobject_put(&policy->kobj); > goto err_free_real_cpus; > }
Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <[email protected]> -- viresh
