On 10/05/2019 11:23:31+0000, claudiu.bez...@microchip.com wrote:
> From: Claudiu Beznea <claudiu.bez...@microchip.com>
>
> Different IPs uses different bit offsets in registers for the same
> functionality, thus adapt the driver to support this.
>
> Signed-off-by: Claudiu Beznea <claudiu.bez...@microchip.com>
> ---
> drivers/clk/at91/sckc.c | 100
> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------
> 1 file changed, 67 insertions(+), 33 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/clk/at91/sckc.c b/drivers/clk/at91/sckc.c
> index 6c55a7a86f79..2a4ac548de80 100644
> --- a/drivers/clk/at91/sckc.c
> +++ b/drivers/clk/at91/sckc.c
> @@ -22,15 +22,23 @@
> #define SLOWCK_SW_TIME_USEC ((SLOWCK_SW_CYCLES * USEC_PER_SEC) / \
> SLOW_CLOCK_FREQ)
>
> -#define AT91_SCKC_CR 0x00
> -#define AT91_SCKC_RCEN (1 << 0)
> -#define AT91_SCKC_OSC32EN (1 << 1)
> -#define AT91_SCKC_OSC32BYP (1 << 2)
> -#define AT91_SCKC_OSCSEL (1 << 3)
> +#define AT91_SCKC_CR 0x00
> +#define AT91_SCKC_RCEN(off) ((off)->cr_rcen)
> +#define AT91_SCKC_OSC32EN(off) ((off)->cr_osc32en)
> +#define AT91_SCKC_OSC32BYP(off) ((off)->cr_osc32byp)
> +#define AT91_SCKC_OSCSEL(off) ((off)->cr_oscsel)
> +
> +struct clk_slow_bits {
> + u32 cr_rcen;
This bit is only used on sam9x5 so I wouldn't bother having it in the
structure, especially since its use will always be quite separate from
the other ones as it is controlling a separate clock.
> + u32 cr_osc32en;
> + u32 cr_osc32byp;
> + u32 cr_oscsel;
> +};
>
> struct clk_slow_osc {
> struct clk_hw hw;
> void __iomem *sckcr;
> + const struct clk_slow_bits *bits;
> unsigned long startup_usec;
> };
>
> @@ -39,6 +47,7 @@ struct clk_slow_osc {
> struct clk_sama5d4_slow_osc {
> struct clk_hw hw;
> void __iomem *sckcr;
> + const struct clk_slow_bits *bits;
> unsigned long startup_usec;
> bool prepared;
> };
> @@ -48,6 +57,7 @@ struct clk_sama5d4_slow_osc {
> struct clk_slow_rc_osc {
> struct clk_hw hw;
> void __iomem *sckcr;
> + const struct clk_slow_bits *bits;
> unsigned long frequency;
> unsigned long accuracy;
> unsigned long startup_usec;
> @@ -58,6 +68,7 @@ struct clk_slow_rc_osc {
> struct clk_sam9x5_slow {
> struct clk_hw hw;
> void __iomem *sckcr;
> + const struct clk_slow_bits *bits;
> u8 parent;
> };
>
> @@ -69,10 +80,11 @@ static int clk_slow_osc_prepare(struct clk_hw *hw)
> void __iomem *sckcr = osc->sckcr;
> u32 tmp = readl(sckcr);
>
> - if (tmp & (AT91_SCKC_OSC32BYP | AT91_SCKC_OSC32EN))
> + if (tmp & (AT91_SCKC_OSC32BYP(osc->bits) |
> + AT91_SCKC_OSC32EN(osc->bits)))
I still find that:
if (tmp & (osc->bits->cr_osc32byp | osc->bits->cr_osc32en))
would be shorter and easier to read and still fits on one line.
--
Alexandre Belloni, Bootlin
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
https://bootlin.com
