On Tue, Aug 21, 2007 at 07:35:50PM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote: > Obviously a gcc <= 3.4 [1], and therefore no unit-at-a-time.
Actually there are widely used 3.3 variants that support unit-at-a-time (e.g. 3.3-hammer which was shipped by several distributions for some time) There are still a lot of systems around which use gcc 3.3 (less so with 3.4). Unless there's a major bug that is hard to work around I would prefer to keep it supported. Bogus warnings should be relatively harmless. > And it's becoming a real maintainance problem that not only this problem > but also other problems like some section mismatches [2] are only > present without unit-at-a-time. The unit-at-a-time output order is not defined, so even if it works with the current compiler a compiler change might still trigger that problem. So it would be better to fix those anyways. -Andi - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/