On 14/05/2019 18:18, Sowjanya Komatineni wrote:
>> Subject: Re: [PATCH V5 1/4] spi: tegra114: add support for gpio based CS
> 
>> On 14/05/2019 06:03, Sowjanya Komatineni wrote:
>>> This patch adds support for GPIO based CS control through SPI core 
>>> function spi_set_cs.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Sowjanya Komatineni <skomatin...@nvidia.com>
>> Can you elaborate on the use-case where this is needed? I am curious what 
>> platforms are using this and why they would not use the dedicated CS signals.
>>
>> Cheers
>> Jon
> 
> Tegra SPI doesn’t support inter byte delay directly to meet some SPI slave 
> requirements.
> So we use GPIO control CS in parallel with a dummy HW CS and use inactive 
> cycles delay of SPI controller to mimic inter byte delay.
> 
> Currently we don’t have specific SPI slave on upstream supported platforms 
> but considering raspberry PI header where SPI I/F is exposed to pins it 
> allows user to connect any SPI slave and this helps for some slaves that need 
> specific inter byte delay.

Maybe add these details to the commit message so that it is clear what
the motivation for this is.

Thanks
Jon

-- 
nvpublic

Reply via email to