On 8/21/07, Roman Zippel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > The way you currently define "disabled" means that even symbols set to 'm' > are disabled, I don't think that's what you really mean. :) When seeing > disabled I also first thought of the option being completely invisible due > to dependencies. >
Thanks for your feedback Roman. What about something like this? if (sym && sym->name && !(sym->flags & SYMBOL_CONST)) { + bool isNotSelected = (print_filter(sym_get_string_value(sym)) == "n"); + if (isNotSelected) { + const QColor c(palette().disabled().text()); + *text += "<font color=\"" + c.name() + "\">"; + } *text += QString().sprintf("<a href=\"s%p\">", sym); *text += str2; *text += "</a>"; + if (isNotSelected) + *text += "</font>"; It it's ok for you I can resend a proper patch along the above lines. > > This, together with 'Show all options', allows to quickly > > check out why a given option is hidden. > > Dependencies can also be something like !FOO, in this case you want FOO to > be disabled for option to be unhidden. So if this is intended as a simple > "Click this link to enable this option", then this requires a bit more > work. :) > No it is not intended like a 'click me to enable this option', just as a monitor of current option value. BTW we can have a disabled symbol in the dependency list of a currently enabled option if this is preceded by a '!'. So that in this case you probably would not want to click anywhere. Thanks Marco - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/