On Wed, 15 May 2019, Andy Lutomirski wrote: > > Why not just use an xattr, like security.sgx ? > > Wouldn't this make it so that only someone with CAP_MAC_ADMIN could > install an enclave? I think that this decision should be left up the > administrator, and it should be easy to set up a loose policy where > anyone can load whatever enclave they want. That's what would happen > in my proposal if there was no LSM loaded or of the LSM policy didn't > restrict what .sigstruct files were acceptable. >
You could try user.sigstruct, which does not require any privs. -- James Morris <jmor...@namei.org>
