On 20-08-2007 18:01, Oleg Nesterov wrote: > do_sigaction() returns -ERESTARTNOINTR if signal_pending(). The comment says: > > * If there might be a fatal signal pending on multiple > * threads, make sure we take it before changing the action. > > I think this is not needed. We should only worry about SIGNAL_GROUP_EXIT case, > bit it implies a pending SIGKILL which can't be cleared by do_sigaction.
Isn't it for optimization e.g., to skip this 'do while' loop below for such multiple threads, which would get SIGKILL or SIGSTOP anyway? Regards, Jarek P. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
