From: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyu...@google.com> in_softirq() is a wrong predicate to check if we are in a softirq context. It also returns true if we have BH disabled, so objects are falsely stamped with "softirq" comm. The correct predicate is in_serving_softirq().
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyu...@google.com> Cc: linux...@kvack.org Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org --- mm/kmemleak.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/mm/kmemleak.c b/mm/kmemleak.c index e57bf810f7983..6584ff9778895 100644 --- a/mm/kmemleak.c +++ b/mm/kmemleak.c @@ -588,7 +588,7 @@ static struct kmemleak_object *create_object(unsigned long ptr, size_t size, if (in_irq()) { object->pid = 0; strncpy(object->comm, "hardirq", sizeof(object->comm)); - } else if (in_softirq()) { + } else if (in_serving_softirq()) { object->pid = 0; strncpy(object->comm, "softirq", sizeof(object->comm)); } else { -- 2.21.0.1020.gf2820cf01a-goog