Andi Kleen wrote:
On Wed, Aug 22, 2007 at 12:17:31PM -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote:
Why does that compiler not know __builtin_abs?
I dunno:

gcc --version
gcc (GCC) 4.1.0 (SUSE Linux)

Hmm I use the same compiler from SUSE10.2 and it works for me (with both
mm and only my tree applied) Ok mm fails with some errors in the wireless drivers but with wireless disabled it compiles.

When you compile a simple test program like

main() { printf("%lu\n", __builtin_labs(-1)); }

does it work?

Yes, that works.

One wonders why x86_64-mm-unwinder.patch has an open-coded call to
__builtin_labs(), when include/linux/kernel.h:abs() should do a fine job.

Andrew, I actually checked that and the abs() there is just abs()
not a labs(). So it wouldn't work on 64bit platform.

We could opencode it of course, but __builtin_labs should be really there.

-Andi


--
~Randy
*** Remember to use Documentation/SubmitChecklist when testing your code ***
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to