On Fri, May 24, 2019 at 4:48 AM Chuanhua Han <chuanhua....@nxp.com> wrote:
>
> Hi, Rob Herring
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Leo Li
> > Sent: 2019年5月22日 14:50
> > > > > > > > > - wdog0: watchdog@23c0000 {
> > > > > > > > > - compatible = "fsl,ls1028a-wdt",
> > > > "fsl,imx21-wdt";
> > > > > > > > > - reg = <0x0 0x23c0000 0x0 0x10000>;
> > > > > > > > > - interrupts = <GIC_SPI 59
> > > > > > IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
> > > > > > > > > - clocks = <&clockgen 4 1>;
> > > > > > > > > - big-endian;
> > > > > > > > > - status = "disabled";
> > > > > > > > > + cluster1_core0_watchdog: wdt@c000000 {
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Keep 'watchdog' as the node name,
> > > > > > > Thanks for your replay
> > > > > > > Do you mean replace the ‘wdt’ with ‘watchdog’?
> > > > > > > and keep nodes sort in unit-address.
> > > > > > > What does this mean?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > That means order the nodes by the addresses (e.g. c000000,
> > > > > > c010000)
> > > > > The current order is correct（The first is c000000, then c000000）.
> > > >
> > > > But they are added after gpio@2320000 and before sata@3200000.
> > > I changed and made the second version of the patch, but I found the
> > > following error when I executed ./scripts/checkpatch.pl xxx.patch to
> > > check the patch:
> > >
> > > WARNING: DT compatible string vendor "arm" appears un-documented --
> > > check ./Documentation/devicetree/bindings/vendor-prefixes.txt
> > > #43: FILE: arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/fsl-ls1028a.dtsi:351:
> > > + compatible = "arm,sp805", "arm,primecell";
> > >
> > > However, there is no vendor-prefixes.txt file in the
> > > ./Documentation/devicetree/bindings/ directory, only vendor-
> > > prefixes.yaml.
> > > Moreover, there are ‘arm’ vendors in vendor-prefixes.yaml.
> >
> > Added Rob Herring to the thread.
> >
> > > Request help，thanks
> How can I solve this patch check error? Ask for help, thank you!
Ignore it. A fix to checkpatch.pl is pending.
Rob
