Hi,

On 5/23/19 9:09 PM, Dan Murphy wrote:
Pavel

Thanks for the review

On 5/23/19 7:50 AM, Pavel Machek wrote:
Hi!

+++ b/drivers/leds/leds-lm36274.c

+static int lm36274_parse_dt(struct lm36274 *lm36274_data)
+{
+       struct fwnode_handle *child = NULL;
+       char label[LED_MAX_NAME_SIZE];
+       struct device *dev = &lm36274_data->pdev->dev;
+       const char *name;
+       int child_cnt;
+       int ret = -EINVAL;
+
+       /* There should only be 1 node */
+       child_cnt = device_get_child_node_count(dev);
+       if (child_cnt != 1)
+               return ret;

I'd do explicit "return -EINVAL" here.


ACK

+static int lm36274_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
+{
+       struct ti_lmu *lmu = dev_get_drvdata(pdev->dev.parent);
+       struct lm36274 *lm36274_data;
+       int ret;
+
+       lm36274_data = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, sizeof(*lm36274_data),
+                                   GFP_KERNEL);
+       if (!lm36274_data) {
+               ret = -ENOMEM;
+               return ret;
+       }

And certainly do "return -ENOMEM" explicitly here.


ACK

Acked-by: Pavel Machek <pa...@ucw.cz>

I've done all amendments requested by Pavel and updated branch
ib-leds-mfd-regulator on linux-leds.git, but in the same time
dropped the merge from the for-next.

We will proceed further once we clarify the issue of cross-merging
recently raised again by Linus.

--
Best regards,
Jacek Anaszewski

Reply via email to