On 10-08-2007 09:06, Mariusz Kozlowski wrote: > Hello, > > And the winner of today is ... > > > > ========================================================= > [ INFO: possible irq lock inversion dependency detected ] > 2.6.23-rc2-mm1 #7 > --------------------------------------------------------- > runscript.sh/5843 just changed the state of lock: > (_xmit_ETHER){-+..}, at: [<c03cbe79>] dev_watchdog+0x17/0xcc > but this lock took another, soft-irq-unsafe lock in the past: > (&tp->lock){--..} > > and interrupts could create inverse lock ordering between them. ... > Really no idea who to CC here ;)
IMHO, this should be fixed by last changes to free_irq & request_irq. (Seems to be possible only with CONFIG_DEBUG_SHIRQ?) Otherwise I can be CC-ed - my pleasure! Cheers, Jarek P. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/