On Mon, May 27, 2019 at 05:14:38PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Fri, May 24, 2019 at 11:15:09PM +0300, Imre Deak wrote:
> > diff --git a/kernel/locking/lockdep.c b/kernel/locking/lockdep.c
> > index 967352d32af1..9e2a4ab6c731 100644
> > --- a/kernel/locking/lockdep.c
> > +++ b/kernel/locking/lockdep.c
> > @@ -3637,6 +3637,11 @@ print_lock_nested_lock_not_held(struct task_struct 
> > *curr,
> >  
> >  static int __lock_is_held(const struct lockdep_map *lock, int read);
> >  
> > +static int hlock_reference(int reference)
> > +{
> > +   return reference ? : 1;
> > +}
> > +
> >  /*
> >   * This gets called for every mutex_lock*()/spin_lock*() operation.
> >   * We maintain the dependency maps and validate the locking attempt:
> > @@ -3702,17 +3707,15 @@ static int __lock_acquire(struct lockdep_map *lock, 
> > unsigned int subclass,
> >     if (depth) {
> >             hlock = curr->held_locks + depth - 1;
> >             if (hlock->class_idx == class_idx && nest_lock) {
> > -                   if (hlock->references) {
> > -                           /*
> > -                            * Check: unsigned int references overflow.
> > -                            */
> > -                           if (DEBUG_LOCKS_WARN_ON(hlock->references == 
> > UINT_MAX))
> 
> What tree is this against?

I just used our
        git://anongit.freedesktop.org/drm-tip
and the most recent upstream commit in that is:

$ git merge-base drm-tip origin/master
6b0538da5a6ca2129b93cea5afc997226875c402

which has the commit
commit a188339ca5a396acc588e5851ed7e19f66b0ebd9
Author: Linus Torvalds <torva...@linux-foundation.org>
Date:   Sun May 19 15:47:09 2019 -0700

    Linux 5.2-rc1


> Afaict this is still 12 bits ?!

In the above tree I see
        unsigned int references;
in held_lock which is 32 bits.

> 
> > -                                   return 0;
> > +                   /*
> > +                    * Check: unsigned int references overflow.
> > +                    */
> > +                   if 
> > (DEBUG_LOCKS_WARN_ON(hlock_reference(hlock->references) >
> > +                                           UINT_MAX - 
> > hlock_reference(references)))
> 
> Idem. Also very weird overflow check..

We could have instead (replacing the addition itself too below):

        if (DEBUG_LOCKS_WARN_ON(
                check_add_overflow(hlock_reference(hlock->references),
                                   hlock_reference(references),
                                   &hlock_references)))
                return 0;

by having hlock_reference() take and return unsigned int too.

> 
> > +                           return 0;
> >  
> > -                           hlock->references++;
> > -                   } else {
> > -                           hlock->references = 2;
> > -                   }
> > +                   hlock->references = hlock_reference(hlock->references) +
> > +                                       hlock_reference(references);
> >  
> >                     return 2;
> >             }
> > -- 
> > 2.17.1
> > 

Reply via email to