On Mon, May 27, 2019 at 07:46:43PM +0200, Martin Blumenstingl wrote:
> Hi Neil,
>
> On Mon, May 27, 2019 at 2:26 PM Neil Armstrong <narmstr...@baylibre.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > On 25/05/2019 20:11, Martin Blumenstingl wrote:
> > > MISC_CLK_SEL_WIDTH is only used in one place where it's converted into
> > > a bit-mask. Rename and change the macro to be a bit-mask so that
> > > conversion is not needed anymore. No functional changes intended.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Martin Blumenstingl <martin.blumensti...@googlemail.com>
> > > ---
> > > drivers/pwm/pwm-meson.c | 4 ++--
> > > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/pwm/pwm-meson.c b/drivers/pwm/pwm-meson.c
> > > index c62a3ac924d0..84b28ba0f903 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/pwm/pwm-meson.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/pwm/pwm-meson.c
> > > @@ -33,7 +33,7 @@
> > > #define MISC_A_CLK_DIV_SHIFT 8
> > > #define MISC_B_CLK_SEL_SHIFT 6
> > > #define MISC_A_CLK_SEL_SHIFT 4
> > > -#define MISC_CLK_SEL_WIDTH 2
> > > +#define MISC_CLK_SEL_MASK 0x3
> >
> > NIT I would have used GENMASK here
> that was my initial idea but I decided against it.
> the variant I came up with was: #define MISC_CLK_SEL_MASK GENMASK(1, 0)
>
> however, the actual offset is either 4 or 6 (depending on the PWM channel)
> and I felt that duplicating the macro would just make it more complicated
> so instead I chose to be consistent with MISC_CLK_DIV_MASK
An option would be:
#define MISC_CLK_SEL_MASK(hwid) GENMASK(1 + 4 * (hwid), 0 + 4 *
(hwid))
(Note I didn't check a manual to the 4 above is probably wrong.)
Best regards
Uwe
--
Pengutronix e.K. | Uwe Kleine-König |
Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
