On Fri, Aug 24, 2007 at 03:26:55PM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Fix four instances where cpu_to_node is referenced
> by array instead of via the cpu_to_node macro. This
> is preparation to moving it to the per_cpu data area.
>
...
> unsigned long __init numa_free_all_bootmem(void)
> --- a/arch/x86_64/mm/srat.c
> +++ b/arch/x86_64/mm/srat.c
> @@ -431,9 +431,9 @@
> setup_node_bootmem(i, nodes[i].start, nodes[i].end);
>
> for (i = 0; i < NR_CPUS; i++) {
> - if (cpu_to_node[i] == NUMA_NO_NODE)
> + if (cpu_to_node(i) == NUMA_NO_NODE)
> continue;
> - if (!node_isset(cpu_to_node[i], node_possible_map))
> + if (!node_isset(cpu_to_node(i), node_possible_map))
> numa_set_node(i, NUMA_NO_NODE);
> }
> numa_init_array();
During this particular routine execution, per cpu areas are not yet setup. In
future, when we make cpu_to_node(i) use per cpu area, then this code will break.
And actually setup_per_cpu_areas() uses cpu_to_node(). So...
thanks,
suresh
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
