On 08/24, Cliff Wickman wrote:
> --- linus.070821.orig/kernel/cpuset.c
> +++ linus.070821/kernel/cpuset.c
> @@ -2333,6 +2333,25 @@ cpumask_t cpuset_cpus_allowed(struct tas
> return mask;
> }
>
> +/**
> + * cpuset_cpus_allowed_lock - return cpus_allowed mask from a tasks cpuset.
> + * @tsk: pointer to task_struct from which to obtain cpuset->cpus_allowed.
> + *
> + * Description: Same as cpuset_cpus_allowed, but called with callback_mutex
> + * already held.
> + **/
> +
> +cpumask_t cpuset_cpus_allowed_lock(struct task_struct *tsk)
> +{
> + cpumask_t mask;
> +
> + task_lock(tsk);
> + guarantee_online_cpus(tsk->cpuset, &mask);
> + task_unlock(tsk);
> +
> + return mask;
> +}
Very minor nit, perhaps it makes sense to use this function in
cpuset_cpus_allowed()
to avoid the code duplication. Its name is a bit confusing, imho. How about
cpuset_cpus_allowed_locked() or __cpuset_cpus_allowed() ?
Oleg.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
