Hi again, Julien, On Thu, May 23, 2019 at 05:51:55PM +0100, Will Deacon wrote: > On Mon, Apr 29, 2019 at 05:00:02PM +0100, Julien Thierry wrote: > > [Changing the title to make it reflex more the status of the series.] > > > > Version one[1] of this series attempted to fix the issue reported by > > Zenghui[2] when using the function_graph tracer with IRQ priority > > masking. > > > > Since then, I realized that priority masking and the use of Pseudo-NMIs > > was more broken than I thought. > > Do you plan to respin this in light of Marc's comments?
For now, I marked this as depending on BROKEN in mainline, but please can you look at respinning these fixes so that we can get things fixed properly for 5.3? Thanks, Will
