From: Colin Ian King <colin.k...@canonical.com>

The u32 variable rem is being shifted using u32 arithmetic however
it is being passed to div_u64 that expects the expression to be a u64.
The 32 bit shift may potentially overflow, so cast rem to a u64 before
shifting to avoid this.

Addresses-Coverity: ("Unintentional integer overflow")
Fixes: cd4583206990 ("ixgbe: implement support for SDP/PPS output on X550 
hardware")
Fixes: 68d9676fc04e ("ixgbe: fix PTP SDP pin setup on X540 hardware")
Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.k...@canonical.com>
---
 drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_ptp.c | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_ptp.c 
b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_ptp.c
index 2c4d327fcc2e..ff229d0e9146 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_ptp.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_ptp.c
@@ -209,7 +209,7 @@ static void ixgbe_ptp_setup_sdp_X540(struct ixgbe_adapter 
*adapter)
         * assumes that the cycle counter shift is small enough to avoid
         * overflowing when shifting the remainder.
         */
-       clock_edge += div_u64((rem << cc->shift), cc->mult);
+       clock_edge += div_u64(((u64)rem << cc->shift), cc->mult);
        trgttiml = (u32)clock_edge;
        trgttimh = (u32)(clock_edge >> 32);
 
@@ -295,7 +295,7 @@ static void ixgbe_ptp_setup_sdp_X550(struct ixgbe_adapter 
*adapter)
         * assumes that the cycle counter shift is small enough to avoid
         * overflowing when shifting the remainder.
         */
-       clock_edge += div_u64((rem << cc->shift), cc->mult);
+       clock_edge += div_u64(((u64)rem << cc->shift), cc->mult);
 
        /* X550 hardware stores the time in 32bits of 'billions of cycles' and
         * 32bits of 'cycles'. There's no guarantee that cycles represents
-- 
2.20.1

Reply via email to