Andy Lutomirski <l...@amacapital.net> wrote: > > So that the LSM can see the credentials of the last process to do an fput() > > on a file object when the file object is being dismantled, do the following > > steps: > > > > I still maintain that this is a giant design error.
Yes, I know. This was primarily a post so that Greg could play with the USB notifications stuff I added. The LSM support isn't resolved and is unchanged. > Can someone at least come up with a single valid use case that isn't > entirely full of bugs? "Entirely full of bugs"? How would you propose I deal with Casey's requirement? I'm getting the feeling you're going to nak it if I try to fulfil that and he's going to nak it if I don't. David
