On Fri, Jun 07, 2019 at 02:49:42PM +0000, Ghannam, Yazen wrote:
> Would you mind if the function name stayed the same? The reason is
> that MCA_CTL is written here, which is the "init" part, and MCA_STATUS
> is cleared.
>
> I can use another name for the check, e.g. __mcheck_cpu_check_banks()
> or __mcheck_cpu_banks_check_init().
Nevermind, leave it as is. I'll fix it up ontop. I don't like that
"__mcheck_cpu_init" prefixing there which is a mouthful and should
simply be "mce_cpu_<do_stuff>" to denote that it is a function which is
run on a CPU to setup stuff.
Thx.
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
Good mailing practices for 400: avoid top-posting and trim the reply.
