Le sam. 8 juin 2019 à 15:39, Linus Walleij <linus.wall...@linaro.org> a écrit :
On Sat, Jun 8, 2019 at 12:14 PM Paul Cercueil <p...@crapouillou.net> wrote:
Le sam. 8 juin 2019 à 0:10, Linus Walleij <linus.wall...@linaro.org> a
 écrit :
> On Tue, Jun 4, 2019 at 6:34 PM Paul Cercueil <p...@crapouillou.net>
 > wrote:
 >
 >>  The pin mappings introduced in commit 636f8ba67fb6
 >>  ("MIPS: JZ4740: Qi LB60: Add pinctrl configuration for several
 >> drivers")
>> are completely wrong. The pinctrl driver name is incorrect, and the
 >>  function and group fields are swapped.
 >>
 >>  Fixes: 636f8ba67fb6 ("MIPS: JZ4740: Qi LB60: Add pinctrl
 >> configuration for several drivers")
 >>  Cc: <sta...@vger.kernel.org>
 >>  Signed-off-by: Paul Cercueil <p...@crapouillou.net>
 >
 > Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.wall...@linaro.org>
 >
> Such things happen. Are you planning to phase all the board files over
 > to use devicetree eventually?

 Yes, that's definitely what's planned; right now the blockers are
patchsets [1] and [2]. [1] is ignored by everybody because there's no
 maintainer for drivers/memory/. [2] is a year-long effort that still
 doesn't show me the light at the end of the tunnel.

 [1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2019/6/4/743
 [2] https://lkml.org/lkml/2019/5/21/679

What? That's unacceptable, the last resort is usually to send the
patches to Andrew Morton (whether fair or not) when nothing gets
applied.

In this case I would however encourage the MIPS maintainer to
simply queue this stuff in the MIPS tree as blocking his arch work
if not merged, Ralf would you consider just queueing this?
I do not think the other Linus would mind.

It's not that critical - it's not blocking until [2] gets merged too.
But yes, it's been sitting idle for a while.

Yours,
Linus Walleij


Reply via email to