On 28/05/2019 18:55, Andrew F. Davis wrote:
TI-SCI firmware will only respond to messages when the TI_SCI_FLAG_REQ_ACK_ON_PROCESSED flag is set. Most messages already do this, set this for the ones that do not.This will be enforced in future firmware that better match the TI-SCI specifications, this patch will not break users of existing firmware. Fixes: aa276781a64a ("firmware: Add basic support for TI System Control Interface (TI-SCI) protocol") Signed-off-by: Andrew F. Davis <[email protected]> Acked-by: Nishanth Menon <[email protected]> Tested-by: Alejandro Hernandez <[email protected]> --- Changes from v1: - Rebased on v5.2-rc2
Thanks, queuing up for 5.3. -Tero
drivers/firmware/ti_sci.c | 8 ++++---- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/firmware/ti_sci.c b/drivers/firmware/ti_sci.c index ef93406ace1b..36ce11a67235 100644 --- a/drivers/firmware/ti_sci.c +++ b/drivers/firmware/ti_sci.c @@ -466,9 +466,9 @@ static int ti_sci_cmd_get_revision(struct ti_sci_info *info) struct ti_sci_xfer *xfer; int ret;- /* No need to setup flags since it is expected to respond */xfer = ti_sci_get_one_xfer(info, TI_SCI_MSG_VERSION, - 0x0, sizeof(struct ti_sci_msg_hdr), + TI_SCI_FLAG_REQ_ACK_ON_PROCESSED, + sizeof(struct ti_sci_msg_hdr), sizeof(*rev_info)); if (IS_ERR(xfer)) { ret = PTR_ERR(xfer); @@ -596,9 +596,9 @@ static int ti_sci_get_device_state(const struct ti_sci_handle *handle, info = handle_to_ti_sci_info(handle); dev = info->dev;- /* Response is expected, so need of any flags */xfer = ti_sci_get_one_xfer(info, TI_SCI_MSG_GET_DEVICE_STATE, - 0, sizeof(*req), sizeof(*resp)); + TI_SCI_FLAG_REQ_ACK_ON_PROCESSED, + sizeof(*req), sizeof(*resp)); if (IS_ERR(xfer)) { ret = PTR_ERR(xfer); dev_err(dev, "Message alloc failed(%d)\n", ret);
-- Texas Instruments Finland Oy, Porkkalankatu 22, 00180 Helsinki. Y-tunnus/Business ID: 0615521-4. Kotipaikka/Domicile: Helsinki
