On Tue, 11 Jun 2019 at 16:59, YueHaibing <yuehaib...@huawei.com> wrote:
>
> Fix sparse warnings:
>
> drivers/net/dsa/sja1105/sja1105_main.c:1848:6:
> warning: symbol 'sja1105_port_rxtstamp' was not declared. Should it be
> static?
> drivers/net/dsa/sja1105/sja1105_main.c:1869:6:
> warning: symbol 'sja1105_port_txtstamp' was not declared. Should it be
> static?
>
> Reported-by: Hulk Robot <hul...@huawei.com>
> Signed-off-by: YueHaibing <yuehaib...@huawei.com>
> ---
> drivers/net/dsa/sja1105/sja1105_main.c | 8 ++++----
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/dsa/sja1105/sja1105_main.c
> b/drivers/net/dsa/sja1105/sja1105_main.c
> index 81e1ba5..9395e8f 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/dsa/sja1105/sja1105_main.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/dsa/sja1105/sja1105_main.c
> @@ -1845,8 +1845,8 @@ static void sja1105_rxtstamp_work(struct work_struct
> *work)
> }
>
> /* Called from dsa_skb_defer_rx_timestamp */
> -bool sja1105_port_rxtstamp(struct dsa_switch *ds, int port,
> - struct sk_buff *skb, unsigned int type)
> +static bool sja1105_port_rxtstamp(struct dsa_switch *ds, int port,
> + struct sk_buff *skb, unsigned int type)
> {
> struct sja1105_private *priv = ds->priv;
> struct sja1105_tagger_data *data = &priv->tagger_data;
> @@ -1866,8 +1866,8 @@ bool sja1105_port_rxtstamp(struct dsa_switch *ds, int
> port,
> * the skb and have it available in DSA_SKB_CB in the .port_deferred_xmit
> * callback, where we will timestamp it synchronously.
> */
> -bool sja1105_port_txtstamp(struct dsa_switch *ds, int port,
> - struct sk_buff *skb, unsigned int type)
> +static bool sja1105_port_txtstamp(struct dsa_switch *ds, int port,
> + struct sk_buff *skb, unsigned int type)
> {
> struct sja1105_private *priv = ds->priv;
> struct sja1105_port *sp = &priv->ports[port];
> --
> 2.7.4
>
>
Tested-by: Vladimir Oltean <olte...@gmail.com>
Thanks!
-Vladimir
