----- On Jun 10, 2019, at 4:43 PM, carlos car...@redhat.com wrote: > On 6/6/19 7:57 AM, Florian Weimer wrote: >> Let me ask the key question again: Does it matter if code observes the >> rseq area first without kernel support, and then with kernel support? >> If we don't expect any problems immediately, we do not need to worry >> much about the constructor ordering right now. I expect that over time, >> fixing this properly will become easier. > > I just wanted to chime in and say that splitting this into: > > * Ownership (__rseq_handled) > > * Initialization (__rseq_abi) > > Makes sense to me. > > I agree we need an answer to this question of ownership but not yet > initialized, to owned and initialized. > > I like the idea of having __rseq_handled in ld.so.
Very good, so I'll implement this approach. Sorry for the delayed feedback, I am traveling this week. Thanks, Mathieu -- Mathieu Desnoyers EfficiOS Inc. http://www.efficios.com
