12.06.2019 11:30, Jon Hunter пишет:
>
> On 10/06/2019 17:43, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
>> The clocksource rate is initialized only for the first per-CPU clocksource
>> and then that rate shall be replicated for the rest of clocksource's
>> because they are initialized manually in the code.
>>
>> Fixes: 3be2a85a0b61 ("Support per-CPU timers on all Tegra's")
>> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Osipenko <dig...@gmail.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/clocksource/timer-tegra.c | 2 ++
>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/clocksource/timer-tegra.c
>> b/drivers/clocksource/timer-tegra.c
>> index 9406855781ff..830c66e2d927 100644
>> --- a/drivers/clocksource/timer-tegra.c
>> +++ b/drivers/clocksource/timer-tegra.c
>> @@ -277,6 +277,8 @@ static int __init tegra_init_timer(struct device_node
>> *np, bool tegra20,
>> */
>> if (tegra20)
>> cpu_to->of_clk.rate = 1000000;
>> + else
>> + cpu_to->of_clk.rate = timer_of_rate(to);
>>
>> cpu_to = per_cpu_ptr(&tegra_to, cpu);
>> cpu_to->of_base.base = timer_reg_base + base;
>
> Thanks. This fixes a boot regression we are seeing on -next with
> Tegra210 (introduced by the commit referenced above). So ...
>
> Acked-by: Jon Hunter <jonath...@nvidia.com>
> Tested-by: Jon Hunter <jonath...@nvidia.com>
Thanks for the testing :)
