On 6/13/19 11:59 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 13, 2019 at 10:33:23AM -0400, Jason Baron wrote:
>> On 6/12/19 11:35 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
>>> When calling debugfs functions, there is no need to ever check the
>>> return value.  The function can work or not, but the code logic should
>>> never do something different based on this.
>>>
>>> Cc: Jason Baron <jba...@akamai.com>
>>> Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
>>> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gre...@linuxfoundation.org>
>>> ---
>>>  lib/dynamic_debug.c | 12 +++---------
>>>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/lib/dynamic_debug.c b/lib/dynamic_debug.c
>>> index 8a16c2d498e9..c60409138e13 100644
>>> --- a/lib/dynamic_debug.c
>>> +++ b/lib/dynamic_debug.c
>>> @@ -993,20 +993,14 @@ static __initdata int ddebug_init_success;
>>>  
>>>  static int __init dynamic_debug_init_debugfs(void)
>>>  {
>>> -   struct dentry *dir, *file;
>>> +   struct dentry *dir;
>>>  
>>>     if (!ddebug_init_success)
>>>             return -ENODEV;
>>>  
>>>     dir = debugfs_create_dir("dynamic_debug", NULL);
>>> -   if (!dir)
>>> -           return -ENOMEM;
>>> -   file = debugfs_create_file("control", 0644, dir, NULL,
>>> -                                   &ddebug_proc_fops);
>>> -   if (!file) {
>>> -           debugfs_remove(dir);
>>> -           return -ENOMEM;
>>> -   }
>>> +   debugfs_create_file("control", 0644, dir, NULL, &ddebug_proc_fops);
>>> +
>>>     return 0;
>>>  }
>>>  
>>>
>>
>> Looks like debugfs_create_dir() can return NULL,
> 
> No it can not.
>

Ok, I looked at the wrong definition for failed_creating() :(
In that case:

Acked-by: Jason Baron <jba...@akamai.com>

Thanks,

-Jason

Reply via email to