Hi Daniel,
Am Dienstag, 4. Juni 2019, 18:57:57 CEST schrieb Daniel Lezcano:
> Currently the common thermal zones definitions for the rk3399 assumes
> multiple thermal zones are supported by the governors. This is not the
> case and each thermal zone has its own governor instance acting
> individually without collaboration with other governors.
>
> As the cooling device for the CPU and the GPU thermal zones is the
> same, each governors take different decisions for the same cooling
> device leading to conflicting instructions and an erratic behavior.
>
> As the cooling-maps is about to become an optional property, let's
> remove the cpu cooling device map from the GPU thermal zone.
>
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezc...@linaro.org>
> ---
> arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399.dtsi | 9 ---------
> 1 file changed, 9 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399.dtsi
> b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399.dtsi
> index 196ac9b78076..e1357e0f60f7 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399.dtsi
> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399.dtsi
> @@ -821,15 +821,6 @@
> type = "critical";
> };
> };
> -
> - cooling-maps {
> - map0 {
> - trip = <&gpu_alert0>;
> - cooling-device =
> - <&cpu_b0 THERMAL_NO_LIMIT
> THERMAL_NO_LIMIT>,
> - <&cpu_b1 THERMAL_NO_LIMIT
> THERMAL_NO_LIMIT>;
> - };
> - };
> };
> };
my knowledge of the thermal framework is not that big, but what about the
rk3399-devices which further detail the cooling-maps like rk3399-gru-kevin
and the rk3399-nanopc-t4 with its fan-handling in the cooling-maps?
Heiko
