Fixes gcc '-Wunused-but-set-variable' warning:

drivers/firmware/ti_sci.c: In function ti_sci_cmd_ring_config:
drivers/firmware/ti_sci.c:2035:17: warning: variable dev set but not used 
[-Wunused-but-set-variable]
drivers/firmware/ti_sci.c: In function ti_sci_cmd_ring_get_config:
drivers/firmware/ti_sci.c:2104:17: warning: variable dev set but not used 
[-Wunused-but-set-variable]
drivers/firmware/ti_sci.c: In function ti_sci_cmd_rm_udmap_tx_ch_cfg:
drivers/firmware/ti_sci.c:2287:17: warning: variable dev set but not used 
[-Wunused-but-set-variable]
drivers/firmware/ti_sci.c: In function ti_sci_cmd_rm_udmap_rx_ch_cfg:
drivers/firmware/ti_sci.c:2357:17: warning: variable dev set but not used 
[-Wunused-but-set-variable]

It is never used since commit 1e407f337f40 ("firmware:
ti_sci: Add support for processor control")

Reported-by: Hulk Robot <hul...@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: YueHaibing <yuehaib...@huawei.com>
---
 drivers/firmware/ti_sci.c | 8 --------
 1 file changed, 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/firmware/ti_sci.c b/drivers/firmware/ti_sci.c
index 86b2727..8c1a961 100644
--- a/drivers/firmware/ti_sci.c
+++ b/drivers/firmware/ti_sci.c
@@ -2032,14 +2032,12 @@ static int ti_sci_cmd_ring_config(const struct 
ti_sci_handle *handle,
        struct ti_sci_msg_hdr *resp;
        struct ti_sci_xfer *xfer;
        struct ti_sci_info *info;
-       struct device *dev;
        int ret = 0;
 
        if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(handle))
                return -EINVAL;
 
        info = handle_to_ti_sci_info(handle);
-       dev = info->dev;
 
        xfer = ti_sci_get_one_xfer(info, TI_SCI_MSG_RM_RING_CFG,
                                   TI_SCI_FLAG_REQ_ACK_ON_PROCESSED,
@@ -2101,14 +2099,12 @@ static int ti_sci_cmd_ring_get_config(const struct 
ti_sci_handle *handle,
        struct ti_sci_msg_rm_ring_get_cfg_req *req;
        struct ti_sci_xfer *xfer;
        struct ti_sci_info *info;
-       struct device *dev;
        int ret = 0;
 
        if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(handle))
                return -EINVAL;
 
        info = handle_to_ti_sci_info(handle);
-       dev = info->dev;
 
        xfer = ti_sci_get_one_xfer(info, TI_SCI_MSG_RM_RING_GET_CFG,
                                   TI_SCI_FLAG_REQ_ACK_ON_PROCESSED,
@@ -2284,14 +2280,12 @@ static int ti_sci_cmd_rm_udmap_tx_ch_cfg(const struct 
ti_sci_handle *handle,
        struct ti_sci_msg_hdr *resp;
        struct ti_sci_xfer *xfer;
        struct ti_sci_info *info;
-       struct device *dev;
        int ret = 0;
 
        if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(handle))
                return -EINVAL;
 
        info = handle_to_ti_sci_info(handle);
-       dev = info->dev;
 
        xfer = ti_sci_get_one_xfer(info, TISCI_MSG_RM_UDMAP_TX_CH_CFG,
                                   TI_SCI_FLAG_REQ_ACK_ON_PROCESSED,
@@ -2354,14 +2348,12 @@ static int ti_sci_cmd_rm_udmap_rx_ch_cfg(const struct 
ti_sci_handle *handle,
        struct ti_sci_msg_hdr *resp;
        struct ti_sci_xfer *xfer;
        struct ti_sci_info *info;
-       struct device *dev;
        int ret = 0;
 
        if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(handle))
                return -EINVAL;
 
        info = handle_to_ti_sci_info(handle);
-       dev = info->dev;
 
        xfer = ti_sci_get_one_xfer(info, TISCI_MSG_RM_UDMAP_RX_CH_CFG,
                                   TI_SCI_FLAG_REQ_ACK_ON_PROCESSED,
-- 
2.7.4


Reply via email to