> From: [email protected]
> <[email protected]> On Behalf Of Dexuan Cui
> Sent: Friday, June 14, 2019 8:23 PM
> To: David Miller <[email protected]>; Sunil Muthuswamy
> <[email protected]>
> Cc: KY Srinivasan <[email protected]>; Haiyang Zhang
> <[email protected]>; Stephen Hemminger
> <[email protected]>; [email protected]; Michael Kelley
> <[email protected]>; [email protected];
> [email protected]; [email protected]
> Subject: RE: [PATCH net] hvsock: fix epollout hang from race condition
>
> > From: [email protected]
> > <[email protected]> On Behalf Of David Miller
> > Sent: Friday, June 14, 2019 7:15 PM
> > To: Sunil Muthuswamy <[email protected]>
> >
> > This adds lots of new warnings:
> >
> > net/vmw_vsock/hyperv_transport.c: In function ‘hvs_probe’:
> > net/vmw_vsock/hyperv_transport.c:205:20: warning: ‘vnew’ may be used
> > uninitialized in this function [-Wmaybe-uninitialized]
> > remote->svm_port = host_ephemeral_port++;
> > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> > net/vmw_vsock/hyperv_transport.c:332:21: note: ‘vnew’ was declared
> here
> > struct vsock_sock *vnew;
> > ^~~~
> > net/vmw_vsock/hyperv_transport.c:406:22: warning: ‘hvs_new’ may be
> > used uninitialized in this function [-Wmaybe-uninitialized]
> > hvs_new->vm_srv_id = *if_type;
> > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^~~~~~~~~~
> > net/vmw_vsock/hyperv_transport.c:333:23: note: ‘hvs_new’ was declared
> > here
> > struct hvsock *hvs, *hvs_new;
> > ^~~~~~~
>
> Hi David,
> These warnings are not introduced by this patch from Sunil.
Well, technically speaking, the warnings are caused by Suni's patch, but I
think it should
be a bug of gcc (I'm using "gcc (Ubuntu 8.2.0-12ubuntu1) 8.2.0"). As you can
see, the
line numbers given by gcc, i.e. line 205, line 406, are not related to the
warnings.
Actually, the same warnings can repro with the below one-line patch on this
commit of
today's net.git:
9a33629ba6b2 ("hv_netvsc: Set probe mode to sync")
--- a/net/vmw_vsock/hyperv_transport.c
+++ b/net/vmw_vsock/hyperv_transport.c
@@ -403,6 +403,7 @@ static void hvs_open_connection(struct vmbus_channel *chan)
set_per_channel_state(chan, conn_from_host ? new : sk);
vmbus_set_chn_rescind_callback(chan, hvs_close_connection);
+ asm ("nop");
if (conn_from_host) {
new->sk_state = TCP_ESTABLISHED;
It looks a simple inline assembly code can confuse gcc. I'm not sure if I should
report a bug for gcc...
I posted a patch to suppress these bogus warnings just now. The Subject is:
[PATCH net] hv_sock: Suppress bogus "may be used uninitialized" warnings
Thanks,
-- Dexuan