On Wed, 29 Aug 2007 16:15:45 PDT, Andrew Morton said:

> So it's an interaction between the x86_64 vdso patches in Andi's tree and 
> newer glibc, and we don't know which one is getting it wrong yet?
> 
> If I ever get another -mm out the door (have been without electricity for
> several days) I'll drop the vdso changes until this is sorted out.

Don't bother, I tested this last night against a vanilla 2.6.23-rc3 kernel
and it had the same issue as well.  So Andi's vdso patches in his tree and/or
the -mm kernel aren't to blame - it's in mainline as well.  And it's been
in for a while - I also hit it with a 2.6.22-rc6-mm1 kernel.

Attachment: pgp5nj924gJUL.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to