On Sun, 16 Jun 2019, Bae, Chang Seok wrote: > > > On Jun 16, 2019, at 05:34, Thomas Gleixner <t...@linutronix.de> wrote: > > > > On Sun, 16 Jun 2019, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > >> > >> Please dont. Send me a delta patch against the documentation. I have queued > >> all the other patches already internally. I did not push it out because I > >> wanted to have proper docs. > > > > Fixed it up already. About to push it out. > > > > Thanks. This is the diff though. > > diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/preempt.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/preempt.h > index 22992c8377952..f667087792747 100644 > --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/preempt.h > +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/preempt.h > @@ -118,7 +118,7 @@ static __always_inline bool should_resched(int > preempt_offset) > > /* preempt count == 0 ? */ > tmp &= ~PREEMPT_NEED_RESCHED; > - if (tmp) > + if (tmp != preempt_offset) > return false; > if (current_thread_info()->preempt_lazy_count) > return false; > diff --git a/kernel/softirq.c b/kernel/softirq.c > index c15583162a559..25bcf2f2714ba 100644 > --- a/kernel/softirq.c > +++ b/kernel/softirq.c > @@ -92,6 +92,34 @@ static inline void softirq_clr_runner(unsigned int sirq) > sr->runner[sirq] = NULL; > } > > +static bool softirq_check_runner_tsk(struct task_struct *tsk, > + unsigned int *pending)
WHAT? How is this related ?
