On 6/14/19 10:51 AM, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
14.06.2019 18:50, Bitan Biswas пишет:
Remove redundant BUG_ON calls or replace with WARN_ON_ONCE
as needed. Remove BUG() and mask Rx interrupt similar as Tx
for message fully sent case. Add WARN_ON_ONCE check
for non-zero rx_fifo_avail in tegra_i2c_empty_rx_fifo()
after all processing. Error handling in tegra_i2c_empty_rx_fifo
caller is also added.

Signed-off-by: Bitan Biswas <[email protected]>
---
  drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-tegra.c | 46 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
  1 file changed, 38 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-tegra.c b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-tegra.c
index 4dfb4c1..26a7c8c 100644
--- a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-tegra.c
+++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-tegra.c
@@ -73,6 +73,7 @@
  #define I2C_ERR_NO_ACK                                BIT(0)
  #define I2C_ERR_ARBITRATION_LOST              BIT(1)
  #define I2C_ERR_UNKNOWN_INTERRUPT             BIT(2)
+#define I2C_ERR_UNEXPECTED_STATUS              BIT(3)

What about I2C_ERR_RX_BUFFER_OVERFLOW?
OK.


  #define PACKET_HEADER0_HEADER_SIZE_SHIFT      28
  #define PACKET_HEADER0_PACKET_ID_SHIFT                16
@@ -515,15 +516,23 @@ static int tegra_i2c_empty_rx_fifo(struct tegra_i2c_dev 
*i2c_dev)
         * prevent overwriting past the end of buf
         */
        if (rx_fifo_avail > 0 && buf_remaining > 0) {
-               BUG_ON(buf_remaining > 3);
+               /* buf_remaining > 3 check not needed as rx_fifo_avail == 0
+                * when (words_to_transfer was > rx_fifo_avail) earlier
+                * in this function
+                */

Please start all multiline comments with an empty "/*", it should be the correct
style. There are some places in the kernel where style like yours is used, but I
assume they are not very correct. Besides, yours variant is not consistent with 
the
style of the rest of comments in this source file. And put a dot in the end for
completeness. Same for the other comments in this patch.

OK

                val = i2c_readl(i2c_dev, I2C_RX_FIFO);
                val = cpu_to_le32(val);
                memcpy(buf, &val, buf_remaining);
                buf_remaining = 0;
                rx_fifo_avail--;
        }

Please add a newline here. All logical parts of the code should be separated to 
ease
reading and following.
OK


+       if (WARN_ON_ONCE(rx_fifo_avail))
+               return -EINVAL;
- BUG_ON(rx_fifo_avail > 0 && buf_remaining > 0);
+       /* buf_remaining > 0 at this point can only have rx_fifo_avail == 0
+        * as this corresponds to (words_to_transfer was > rx_fifo_avail)
+        * case earlier in this function
+        */
        i2c_dev->msg_buf_remaining = buf_remaining;
        i2c_dev->msg_buf = buf;
@@ -581,7 +590,10 @@ static int tegra_i2c_fill_tx_fifo(struct tegra_i2c_dev *i2c_dev)
         * boundary and fault.
         */
        if (tx_fifo_avail > 0 && buf_remaining > 0) {
-               BUG_ON(buf_remaining > 3);
+               /* buf_remaining > 3 check not needed as tx_fifo_avail == 0
+                * when (words_to_transfer was > tx_fifo_avail) earlier
+                * in this function for non-zero words_to_transfer
+                */
                memcpy(&val, buf, buf_remaining);
                val = le32_to_cpu(val);
@@ -811,6 +823,7 @@ static irqreturn_t tegra_i2c_isr(int irq, void *dev_id)
        u32 status;
        const u32 status_err = I2C_INT_NO_ACK | I2C_INT_ARBITRATION_LOST;
        struct tegra_i2c_dev *i2c_dev = dev_id;
+       int err_val;
status = i2c_readl(i2c_dev, I2C_INT_STATUS); @@ -847,10 +860,21 @@ static irqreturn_t tegra_i2c_isr(int irq, void *dev_id) if (!i2c_dev->is_curr_dma_xfer) {
                if (i2c_dev->msg_read && (status & I2C_INT_RX_FIFO_DATA_REQ)) {
-                       if (i2c_dev->msg_buf_remaining)
-                               tegra_i2c_empty_rx_fifo(i2c_dev);
-                       else
-                               BUG();
+                       err_val = tegra_i2c_empty_rx_fifo(i2c_dev);
+                       if ((!(i2c_dev->msg_buf_remaining)) &&

Let's move this check into tegra_i2c_empty_rx_fifo() and return -EINVAL for 
that case.
This will make code to look cleaner.
OK.



+                           (!(status & I2C_INT_PACKET_XFER_COMPLETE)) &&

It shouldn't matter that XFER_COMPLETE is set if RX FIFO isn't fully emptied 
because
it always shall be emptied. Hence this check is not needed and we should error 
out
regardless.
OK


+                           err_val) {
+                               /*
+                                * Overflow error condition: message fully sent,
+                                * with no XFER_COMPLETE interrupt but hardware
+                                * asks to transfer more.
+                                */
+                               tegra_i2c_mask_irq(i2c_dev,
+                                                  I2C_INT_RX_FIFO_DATA_REQ);

No need to mask RX_FIFO_DATA_REQ here because all interrupts are masked on "goto
err:", hence just remove the tegra_i2c_mask_irq().

+                               i2c_dev->msg_err |=
+                                       I2C_ERR_UNEXPECTED_STATUS;

No need to split this into two lines because it's less than 80 chars, write 
this in a
single line.
OK


+                               goto err;
+                       }
                }
if (!i2c_dev->msg_read && (status & I2C_INT_TX_FIFO_DATA_REQ)) {
@@ -876,7 +900,13 @@ static irqreturn_t tegra_i2c_isr(int irq, void *dev_id)
        if (status & I2C_INT_PACKET_XFER_COMPLETE) {
                if (i2c_dev->is_curr_dma_xfer)
                        i2c_dev->msg_buf_remaining = 0;
-               BUG_ON(i2c_dev->msg_buf_remaining);
+               /* Underflow error condition: XFER_COMPLETE before message
+                * fully sent.
+                */
+               if (WARN_ON_ONCE(i2c_dev->msg_buf_remaining)) {
+                       i2c_dev->msg_err |= I2C_ERR_UNKNOWN_INTERRUPT;
+                       goto err;
+               }
                complete(&i2c_dev->msg_complete);
        }
        goto done;


Please address comments in the next revision.


Sorry for the delayed reply. I shared Patch V7 with above changes earlier today.

-regards,
 Bitan

Reply via email to