2019-06-17 19:24+0800, Wanpeng Li:
> From: Wanpeng Li <[email protected]>
>
> Wait before calling posted-interrupt deliver function directly to add
> advance timer support to pi_inject_timer.
>
> Cc: Paolo Bonzini <[email protected]>
> Cc: Radim Krčmář <[email protected]>
> Cc: Marcelo Tosatti <[email protected]>
> Signed-off-by: Wanpeng Li <[email protected]>
> ---
Please merge this patch with [2/5], so bisection doesn't break.
> arch/x86/kvm/lapic.c | 6 ++++--
> arch/x86/kvm/lapic.h | 2 +-
> arch/x86/kvm/svm.c | 2 +-
> arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c | 2 +-
> 4 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/lapic.c b/arch/x86/kvm/lapic.c
> index 1a31389..1a31ba5 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/lapic.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/lapic.c
> @@ -1462,6 +1462,8 @@ static void apic_timer_expired(struct kvm_lapic *apic,
> bool can_pi_inject)
> return;
>
> if (can_pi_inject && posted_interrupt_inject_timer(apic->vcpu)) {
> + if (apic->lapic_timer.timer_advance_ns)
> + kvm_wait_lapic_expire(vcpu, true);
>From where does kvm_wait_lapic_expire() take
apic->lapic_timer.expired_tscdeadline?
(I think it would be best to take the functional core of
kvm_wait_lapic_expire() and make it into a function that takes the
expired_tscdeadline as an argument.)
Thanks.
