On Wed, 12 Jun 2019 09:34:19 -0700
Divya Indi <divya.i...@oracle.com> wrote:

> Adding 2 new functions -
> 1) trace_array_lookup : Look up and return a trace array, given its
> name.
> 2) trace_array_set_clr_event : Enable/disable event recording to the
> given trace array.
> 
> Newly added functions trace_array_lookup and trace_array_create also
> need to increment the reference counter associated with the trace array
> they return. This is to ensure the trace array does not get freed
> while in use by the newly introduced APIs.
> The reference ctr is decremented in the trace_array_destroy.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Divya Indi <divya.i...@oracle.com>
> ---
>  include/linux/trace_events.h |  3 +++
>  kernel/trace/trace.c         | 30 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>  kernel/trace/trace_events.c  | 22 ++++++++++++++++++++++
>  3 files changed, 54 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/include/linux/trace_events.h b/include/linux/trace_events.h
> index d7b7d85..0cc99a8 100644
> --- a/include/linux/trace_events.h
> +++ b/include/linux/trace_events.h
> @@ -545,7 +545,10 @@ int trace_array_printk(struct trace_array *tr, unsigned 
> long ip,
>  struct trace_array *trace_array_create(const char *name);
>  int trace_array_destroy(struct trace_array *tr);
>  int ftrace_set_clr_event(struct trace_array *tr, char *buf, int set);
> +struct trace_array *trace_array_lookup(const char *name);
>  int trace_set_clr_event(const char *system, const char *event, int set);
> +int trace_array_set_clr_event(struct trace_array *tr, const char *system,
> +             const char *event, int set);
>  
>  /*
>   * The double __builtin_constant_p is because gcc will give us an error
> diff --git a/kernel/trace/trace.c b/kernel/trace/trace.c
> index a60dc13..fb70ccc 100644
> --- a/kernel/trace/trace.c
> +++ b/kernel/trace/trace.c
> @@ -8364,6 +8364,8 @@ struct trace_array *trace_array_create(const char *name)
>  
>       list_add(&tr->list, &ftrace_trace_arrays);
>  
> +     tr->ref++;
> +

Needs a comment for why the ref is incremented.


>       mutex_unlock(&trace_types_lock);
>       mutex_unlock(&event_mutex);
>  
> @@ -8385,7 +8387,14 @@ struct trace_array *trace_array_create(const char 
> *name)
>  
>  static int instance_mkdir(const char *name)
>  {
> -     return PTR_ERR_OR_ZERO(trace_array_create(name));
> +     struct trace_array *tr;
> +
> +     tr = trace_array_create(name);
> +     if (IS_ERR(tr))
> +             return PTR_ERR(tr);
> +     trace_array_put(tr);

Need a comment to why we need to do a put here.

> +
> +     return 0;
>  }
>  
>  static int __remove_instance(struct trace_array *tr)
> @@ -8434,6 +8443,7 @@ int trace_array_destroy(struct trace_array *tr)
>       mutex_lock(&event_mutex);
>       mutex_lock(&trace_types_lock);
>  
> +     tr->ref--;
>       ret = __remove_instance(tr);
>  
>       mutex_unlock(&trace_types_lock);
> @@ -8465,6 +8475,24 @@ static int instance_rmdir(const char *name)
>       return ret;
>  }
>  

Need a kerneldoc heading here, that also states that if a trace_array
is returned, it requires a call to trace_array_put().


> +struct trace_array *trace_array_lookup(const char *name)
> +{
> +     struct trace_array *tr;
> +
> +     mutex_lock(&trace_types_lock);
> +
> +     list_for_each_entry(tr, &ftrace_trace_arrays, list) {
> +             if (tr->name && strcmp(tr->name, name) == 0) {
> +                     tr->ref++;
> +                     mutex_unlock(&trace_types_lock);
> +                     return tr;
> +             }
> +     }
> +     mutex_unlock(&trace_types_lock);
> +     return NULL;
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(trace_array_lookup);
> +
>  static __init void create_trace_instances(struct dentry *d_tracer)
>  {
>       trace_instance_dir = tracefs_create_instance_dir("instances", d_tracer,
> diff --git a/kernel/trace/trace_events.c b/kernel/trace/trace_events.c
> index 445b059..c126d2c 100644
> --- a/kernel/trace/trace_events.c
> +++ b/kernel/trace/trace_events.c
> @@ -859,6 +859,28 @@ int trace_set_clr_event(const char *system, const char 
> *event, int set)
>  }
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(trace_set_clr_event);
>  
> +/**
> + * trace_array_set_clr_event - enable or disable an event for a trace array
> + * @system: system name to match (NULL for any system)
> + * @event: event name to match (NULL for all events, within system)
> + * @set: 1 to enable, 0 to disable
> + *
> + * This is a way for other parts of the kernel to enable or disable
> + * event recording to instances.
> + *
> + * Returns 0 on success, -EINVAL if the parameters do not match any
> + * registered events.
> + */
> +int trace_array_set_clr_event(struct trace_array *tr, const char *system,
> +             const char *event, int set)
> +{
> +     if (!tr)
> +             return -ENODEV;

If we have this, should we get rid of the external use of
ftrace_set_clr_event()?

-- Steve

> +
> +     return __ftrace_set_clr_event(tr, NULL, system, event, set);
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(trace_array_set_clr_event);
> +
>  /* 128 should be much more than enough */
>  #define EVENT_BUF_SIZE               127
>  

Reply via email to