On 18-06-19, 01:37, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > One more thing. > > handle_update() is very similar to cpufreq_update_freq_work(). > > Why are both of them needed?
I probably did that because of locking required in cpufreq_update_freq_work() but maybe I can do better. Lemme try and come back on it. -- viresh
