On 18/06/2019 15:40, Valentin Schneider wrote:
On 18/06/2019 15:21, Jeremy Linton wrote:
[...]
+ * Return: -ENOENT if the PPTT doesn't exist, the CPU cannot be found or
+ * the table revision isn't new enough.
+ * Otherwise returns flag value
+ */
Nit: strictly speaking we're not returning the flag value but its mask
applied to the flags field. I don't think anyone will care about getting
the actual flag value, but it should be made obvious in the doc:
Or I clarify the code to actually do what the comments says. Maybe that is what
John G was also pointing out too?
No, I was just saying that the kernel topology can be broken without
this series.
Mmm I didn't find any reply from John regarding this in v1, but I wouldn't
mind either way, as long as the doc & code are aligned.
BTW, to me, function acpi_pptt_cpu_is_thread() seems to try to do too
much, i.e. check if the PPTT is new enough to support the thread flag
and also check if it is set for a specific cpu. I'd consider separate
functions here.
thanks,
John
[...]
.
