Hi, On 19/06/19 11:29, Michal Koutný wrote: > On Wed, Jun 05, 2019 at 04:20:03PM +0200, Michal Koutný <mkou...@suse.com> > wrote: > > I considered relaxing the check to non-root cgroups only, however, as > > your example shows, it doesn't prevent reaching the avoided state by > > other paths. I'm not that familiar with RT sched to tell whether > > RT-priority tasks in different task_groups break any assumptions. > So I had another look and the check is bogus. > > The RT sched with !CONFIG_RT_GROUP_SCHED works only with the struct > rt_rq embedded in the generic struct rq -- regardless of the task's > membership in the cpu controller hierarchy.
Yep. > Perhaps, the commit message may mention this also prevents enabling cpu > controller on unified hierarchy (if there are any (kernel) RT tasks to > migrate). Sure. Can add such a comment. > Reviewed-by: Michal Koutný <mkou...@suse.com> Thanks! Peter? Best, Juri
