On Wed, 19 Jun 2019 at 10:40, Manish Narani <mnar...@xilinx.com> wrote: > > Hi Uffe, > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hans...@linaro.org> > > Sent: Monday, June 17, 2019 5:51 PM > [...] > > > > The "const struct zynqmp_eemi_ops *eemi_ops; should then be moved into > > a clock provider specific struct, which is assigned when calling > > sdhci_arasan_register_sdclk. I understand that all the clock data is > > folded into struct sdhci_arasan_data today, but I think that should be > > moved into a "sub-struct" for the clock specifics. > > > > Moreover, when registering the clock, we should convert from using > > devm_clk_register() into devm_clk_hw_register() as the first one is > > now deprecated. > > Just a query here: > When we switch to using devm_clk_hw_register() here, it will register the > clk_hw and return int. > Is there a way we can get the clk (related to the clk_hw registered) from the > clock framework? > I am asking this because we will need that clk pointer while calling > clk_set_phase() function.
I assume devm_clk_get() should work fine? Kind regards Uffe
