On 19-06-19, 14:28, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 19, 2019 at 1:36 PM Viresh Kumar <viresh.ku...@linaro.org> wrote:
> >
> > For code consistency, use has_target() instead of !setpolicy everywhere,
> > as it is already done at several places.
>
> That's OK
>
> > Maybe we should also use !has_target() for setpolicy case to use only one
> > expression
> > for this differentiation.
>
> But I'm not sure what you mean here?
At many places in code we are doing tests like:
if (cpufreq_driver->setpolicy) {
xxx
}
Maybe we can write them as well like:
if (!has_target()) {
xxx
}
--
viresh
