Hi Srini,

On 6/18/2019 10:20 PM, Srinivas Kandagatla wrote:
> 
> 
> On 18/06/2019 17:27, Sricharan R wrote:
>>   The Macro's expect that buffer size is power of 2. So we are infact 
>> passing the actual correct
>>   size ( MAX_DESCRIPTORS + 1 = 4096)
> This will make the circular buffer macros happy but question is that do we 
> actually have that many descriptor buffers?
> 
> This is what is in the driver:
> 
> #define BAM_DESC_FIFO_SIZE    SZ_32K
> #define MAX_DESCRIPTORS (BAM_DESC_FIFO_SIZE / sizeof(struct bam_desc_hw) - 1)
> #define BAM_FIFO_SIZE    (SZ_32K - 8)
> 
> Wouldn't having MAX_DESCRIPTORS + 1 = 4096  lead to overflow the actual 
> descriptor memory size of (SZ_32K - 8) ?
> 

Right, but the CIRC_SPACE macro assumes there is 1 space less than the actual 
size.
That said, agree there is an issue on the boundary. I will also do some testing 
tomorrow
on this and get back.

Regards,
 Sricharan
-- 
"QUALCOMM INDIA, on behalf of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of 
Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation

Reply via email to