On Thu, Jun 20, 2019 at 04:46:06PM -0400, Qian Cai wrote:
> The linux-next commit "mm: security: introduce init_on_alloc=1 and
> init_on_free=1 boot options" [1] introduced a false positive when
> init_on_free=1 and page_poison=on, due to the page_poison expects the
> pattern 0xaa when allocating pages which were overwritten by
> init_on_free=1 with 0.
> 
> Fix it by switching the order between kernel_init_free_pages() and
> kernel_poison_pages() in free_pages_prepare().

Cool; this seems like the right approach. Alexander, what do you think?

Reviewed-by: Kees Cook <keesc...@chromium.org>

-Kees

> 
> [1] https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10999465/
> 
> Signed-off-by: Qian Cai <c...@lca.pw>
> ---
> 
> v2: After further debugging, the issue after switching order is likely a
>     separate issue as clear_page() should not cause issues with future
>     accesses.
> 
>  mm/page_alloc.c | 3 ++-
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/mm/page_alloc.c b/mm/page_alloc.c
> index 54dacf35d200..32bbd30c5f85 100644
> --- a/mm/page_alloc.c
> +++ b/mm/page_alloc.c
> @@ -1172,9 +1172,10 @@ static __always_inline bool free_pages_prepare(struct 
> page *page,
>                                          PAGE_SIZE << order);
>       }
>       arch_free_page(page, order);
> -     kernel_poison_pages(page, 1 << order, 0);
>       if (want_init_on_free())
>               kernel_init_free_pages(page, 1 << order);
> +
> +     kernel_poison_pages(page, 1 << order, 0);
>       if (debug_pagealloc_enabled())
>               kernel_map_pages(page, 1 << order, 0);
>  
> -- 
> 1.8.3.1
> 

-- 
Kees Cook

Reply via email to