Hi LKML,
looking thru lock_sock_nested (while trying to catch
BUG in CIFS as reported on bugzilla #8377) I found
that lock_sock_nested consist of:
void fastcall lock_sock_nested(struct sock *sk, int subclass)
{
might_sleep();
---> spin_lock_bh(&sk->sk_lock.slock);
if (sk->sk_lock.owner)
__lock_sock(sk);
sk->sk_lock.owner = (void *)1;
---> spin_unlock(&sk->sk_lock.slock);
/*
* The sk_lock has mutex_lock() semantics here:
*/
mutex_acquire(&sk->sk_lock.dep_map, subclass, 0, _RET_IP_);
local_bh_enable();
}
so why spin_unlock are there instead of spin_unlock_bh?
To recope with __lock_sock? Am I right?
Cyrill
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
