On Sat, 1 Sep 2007, Jeff Garzik wrote: > Feature deprecation and removal is a very amorphous concept that > does not fit well at all into Kconfig markers, unlike > experimental/broken.
and, as i've said before, i disagree. while one might debate what those words *mean*, or which features should be tagged thusly, i think there's a measurable value to be able to, with one mouse click, say you want to do a build test on the kernel which does not incorporate anything deemed deprecated and/or obsolete. if you don't agree, however, no amount of explaining that on my part is going to change your opinion. rday -- ======================================================================== Robert P. J. Day Linux Consulting, Training and Annoying Kernel Pedantry Waterloo, Ontario, CANADA http://crashcourse.ca ======================================================================== - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
