Hi Thomas, On 23/06/2019 12:18, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > The alternative solution for this is what Vincenzo has in his unified VDSO > patch series: > > https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190621095252.32307-1-vincenzo.frasc...@arm.com > > It leaves the data struct unmodified and has a separate array for the raw > clock. That does not have the side effects at all. > > I'm in the process of merging that series and I actually adapted your > scheme to the new unified infrastructure where it has exactly the same > effects as with your original patches against the x86 version.
please let me know if I need to rework [2/2] based on some not-yet-published branch of yours. -- Best regards, Alexander Sverdlin.
